Puma Hands North American Logistics to Maersk in a Major Shift Toward Shared Automation

Puma partners with Maersk to turn its North American warehouses into shared, automated hubs using AutoStore robotics, unlocking 20 million units of annual capacity.

Published: 2026.10.03

Puma Hands Warehouse Keys to Maersk in a Major Pivot to Shared Supply Chains

For decades, big global apparel brands operated under an unwritten rule: if you want control over your destiny, you must run your own dedicated distribution centers. Companies signed ten-year commercial leases, purchased miles of static conveyor belts, and staffed cavernous facilities designed to survive their single busiest holiday week in November. During the other nine months of the year, half of that expensive real estate sat empty, gathering dust and burning cash.

Puma has broken with that traditional model. Under a new partnership, Danish shipping and logistics giant A.P. Moller – Maersk will take over the management of Puma’s North American distribution network across three United States facilities.

The most significant change in this deal is structural. Instead of locking down these facilities exclusively for Puma sneakers and apparel, Maersk will open up spare capacity across Puma’s three buildings to other retail clients. The centerpiece of this agreement is a flagship distribution hub in Torrance, California. Maersk is installing its first multi-client AutoStore robotic system at this site. When fully running by 2027, the Torrance facility will process 20 million units every year, serving both Puma and non-competing brands that require fast order fulfillment near major West Coast ocean ports and air cargo hubs.

Dedicated Warehouses vs. Multi-Client Shared Automation

How Puma and Maersk are replacing rigid leases with shared robotic capacity

Traditional Dedicated Network

High Fixed Overhead
  • • Brand pays for 100% of warehouse footprint year-round
  • • Up to 40% of shelf space sits empty outside peak season
  • • Manual picking requires massive temporary hiring spikes
  • • Sole financial burden for expensive software and hardware upgrades

Maersk Shared AutoStore Hub

Variable Elastic Model
  • • Unused bins and floor space rented out to third-party brands
  • • AutoStore robots deliver goods directly to pick stations
  • • Year-round high asset utilization across diversified retail clients
  • • Carrier handles automation maintenance, robotics upgrades, and labor
Editorial Verdict: Shared robotic hubs turn static real estate into flexible, pay-as-you-use logistics capacity.

This arrangement marks a turning point in global supply chains. It bridges the gap between traditional ocean shipping and modern omni-channel e-commerce fulfillment.

Think of a traditional company warehouse like owning a private passenger bus. You pay for the vehicle, the fuel, the maintenance, and the driver every day, even when only five seats are occupied.

What Puma and Maersk are building is closer to an automated public transit grid. Puma keeps the seats it needs during rush hour, but Maersk sells the empty seats to other travelers during off-peak hours. As a result, unit fulfillment costs drop for everyone on board, and the building never runs at an expensive loss.


Inside the 20-Million Unit Hub: Torrance Automation Metrics and Shared Floor Economics

To see why this partnership matters, one must examine the physical reality of the Torrance, California facility. Located directly adjacent to the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach, Torrance sits on some of the most expensive industrial real estate in North America. Paying prime warehouse lease rates for static pallet racks in Southern California is an unsustainable approach in modern retail.

Maersk is solving this challenge by deploying AutoStore technology. AutoStore is an automated storage and retrieval system (ASRS) that discards traditional warehouse aisles completely.

Instead of wide hallways where workers walk 10 miles a day or drive forklifts between towering metal shelves, AutoStore stacks plastic storage bins tightly inside a massive, compact aluminum cube (the Grid). High-speed battery-powered robots run across rails on top of the grid. These robots dig down into the stacks, grab the exact bin containing the requested shoe or jacket, and deliver it straight to an ergonomic workstation where a human operator packs the parcel.

Operational Baseline: Maersk Torrance Shared Facility

Core capacity and physical efficiency metrics scheduled for 2027

20M

Annual Unit Throughput

Total apparel and footwear capacity across multi-client operations

4x

Storage Density Gain

Footprint compression achieved by eliminating traditional forklift aisles

2027

Multi-Client Launch

Timeline when third-party brands can tap surplus grid capacity

The economic differences between running a standard dedicated manual warehouse and operating a shared, robotic goods-to-person grid are stark. By analyzing standard industrial real estate rates in the Los Angeles South Bay basin alongside automated throughput benchmarks, the cost shifts become immediately clear.

MetricTraditional Dedicated FacilityShared Automated Hub (AutoStore Model)Practical Operational Impact
Real Estate Footprint Required400,000 sq ft160,000 sq ft60% reduction in square footage needed for identical unit volumes
Storage Density Efficiency25–30% aisle waste90%+ usable cube densityEliminates walking aisles; goods are stacked tightly in aluminum grids
Picking Speed per Worker60–90 units per hour250–350 units per hourWorkers remain stationary while robotic runners deliver bins
Average Off-Peak Space Waste30–45% dead capacityUnder 8% idle capacityMaersk fills seasonal dips by balancing alternate client cycles
Direct Labor Cost per Pick$1.80–$2.40$0.85–$1.15Over 50% savings on picking touches and warehouse floor transit
Order Cycle Time (Dock to Ship)12–24 hours2–4 hoursAccelerated fulfillment speeds same-day cutoff times for e-commerce

In this multi-tenant setup, Maersk does not rely on a single apparel company to pay the monthly building lease. If footwear sales experience a temporary slump in February, inventory from a cosmetics or electronics brand running on the same AutoStore grid can scale up to absorb the available picking robots and bin locations.

The fixed cost of maintaining prime industrial space turns into a shared variable expense.


What Shared Automation Means for Balance Sheets, Lead Times, and Inventory Risk

This operating model shifts the risk profile of everyday supply chain management. For business leaders managing freight, warehouse operations, and cash flow, the Maersk-Puma agreement addresses three persistent operating headaches:

Cracking the Fixed-Cost Trap on Idle Warehouse Space

The standard logistics playbook has historically penalized companies for being cautious. If an operations team leases a 500,000-square-foot facility to ensure they have enough room for peak holiday shipping, they pay lease fees, property taxes, heating, and lighting on that entire building every single month. During slow quarters, that unused space functions like a financial anchor dragged across the balance sheet.

By handing network management to Maersk and authorizing third-party tenancy, Puma eliminates the penalty of unused square footage. Puma secures the fulfillment capacity it requires for sudden inventory arrivals without paying 100% of the long-term holding cost.

Maersk takes the commercial risk of marketing surplus bin locations to outside shippers. In return, Puma protects its operating margins against retail downturns and inventory contractions.

Slashing Fulfillment Times with Goods-to-Person Robotics

Speed in modern retail is no longer just a luxury; it directly dictates sales conversions. When an online shopper orders a pair of running shoes, the warehouse must pick, pack, and label that parcel before daily carrier freight cutoffs, which are often 4:00 PM or 6:00 PM.

The Goods-to-Person Fulfillment Flow

How AutoStore transforms raw shelf storage into rapid parcel dispatch

1

1. Order Routed

Store or e-commerce sale triggers warehouse management system

2

2. Robotic Extraction

Grid robots dig down, unstack bins, and grab exact SKU bin

3

3. Port Delivery

Robot brings bin to stationary worker workstation in seconds

4

4. Single-Touch Pack

Worker scans item, packs parcel, and sends directly to shipping dock

In an unautomated warehouse, picking an order requires a worker to walk through long rows of steel racks, locate a bin, scan a barcode, and push a heavy cart back to a packing table. This manual search process inflates lead times.

With AutoStore, the human picker never leaves the workstation. The robots retrieve the bins from above and lower them directly to the operator’s hands. This single shift cuts order fulfillment times from half a day down to under an hour. Because the Torrance center sits adjacent to major air and ocean hubs, those processed parcels enter courier and freight networks immediately, saving a full business day on standard ground deliveries.

Shielding Peak Season Operations from Labor Shortages

Every fourth quarter, distribution centers across North America scramble to hire hundreds of thousands of seasonal workers. Warehouses enter fierce bidding wars, pushing hourly pay up and incurring massive onboarding and training expenses. Even with higher pay, facilities regularly encounter labor shortfalls that create shipping delays and frustrated customers.

Shared automation acts as an operational shock absorber. Because robots handle the physical transit of products within the Torrance hub, the facility requires significantly fewer manual pickers to move the same volume of goods.

When order volumes spike during promotional events, the facility does not need to scramble to hire hundreds of workers overnight. Operators can simply run the existing robotics fleet across additional shifts, protecting order schedules even during tight regional labor markets.


How Levi Strauss and Major Retailers Leverage Maersk Beyond Ocean Freight

The Puma deal is not an isolated experiment. It represents a central component of Maersk’s multi-year business transformation.

For more than a century, Maersk built its reputation by carrying steel containers across oceans. However, ocean shipping is notoriously cyclical. Ocean freight rates can surge during international disruptions and plummet during economic lulls, making pure ocean carriers vulnerable to steep profit drops.

To counter this volatility, Maersk set out to transform itself into an end-to-end logistics integrator. The company no longer wants to drop a container off at a seaport gate and walk away. Instead, it aims to guide a product from the factory overseas, clear it through customs, haul it via rail or truck, stock it in a distribution center, and deliver it directly to a store shelf or a customer’s front door.

Evaluating the End-to-End Carrier Model

The operational tradeoffs of letting one shipping line manage your entire supply chain

Key Operational Gains

  • ✓ Single throat to choke: complete visibility from overseas port to local warehouse
  • ✓ No handoff delays or finger-pointing between ocean carriers and 3PL warehouse operators
  • ✓ Priority container unloading and faster drayage movement directly into regional hubs

Inherent Strategic Costs

  • • Vendor lock-in: harder to swap carriers quickly if ocean shipping rates diverge
  • • Multi-client grids require rigid standardization in packaging and barcode formats
  • • Enterprise IT systems must deeply integrate with the carrier's proprietary tech stack

Maersk has backed this strategy with massive capital investments:

  • Levi Strauss & Co. Omnichannel Hub: In 2024, Maersk opened a dedicated fulfillment facility specifically engineered to run wholesale distribution and direct-to-consumer e-commerce for apparel icon Levi Strauss & Co.
  • The $100 Million Massachusetts Facility: In Hopedale, Massachusetts, Maersk invested $100 million to build a state-of-the-art e-commerce facility dedicated to an unnamed global retail customer, bringing automated fulfillment close to high-density East Coast population centers.
  • Integrated Port-to-Porch Infrastructure: By tying its ocean container services directly into land-based distribution centers like Torrance, Maersk gives clients the ability to offload incoming container ships and place items into active inventory in a fraction of the time required by disconnected third-party handoffs.

Retailers like Levi Strauss and Puma are buying into this ecosystem because managing fragmented supply chains has become too expensive. Coordinating separate ocean carriers, customs brokers, trucking companies, and third-party warehouse operators creates administrative bloat and blind spots. A single integrated operator eliminates handoff frictions and gives brands clear line-of-sight over their physical stock.


The Next Two Years: How Shared Logistics Hubs Will Reshape Retail Supply Chains

The alliance between Puma and Maersk signals the beginning of a broader restructuring in consumer goods distribution. Over the next 12 to 24 months, standalone, single-tenant corporate warehouses will face mounting margin pressure, while shared automated ecosystems will consolidate distribution volume.

Distribution Strategy Decision Framework

Which fulfillment infrastructure matches your operational profile?

High Seasonality, Standardized SKUs, Omnichannel Retail

Shared Multi-Client Automated Hub

Share robotics infrastructure, convert fixed leases to variable costs, and scale space on demand.

Apparel, Consumer Electronics, Footwear
Oversized Freight, Highly Custom Packaging, Steady Year-Round Volume

Dedicated Single-Tenant Facility

Maintain complete operational autonomy, custom racking, and specialized manual workflows.

Heavy Machinery, Bulk Industrial Goods, Custom Furniture

The Margin Squeeze on Standalone Corporate Facilities

Companies that continue to lease, staff, and run their own isolated warehouses will find it increasingly difficult to compete on cost-per-unit metrics.

Industrial warehouse rents in key logistics corridors remain historically high compared to pre-2020 levels. At the same time, the capital required to build cutting-edge robotics has soared. A top-tier AutoStore installation can cost tens of millions of dollars in upfront hardware, software licensing, and engineering.

Mid-sized and enterprise retail brands running dedicated facilities face an uncomfortable choice: either spend tens of millions of dollars to automate a building that sits half-empty during slow quarters, or continue relying on manual labor that becomes more expensive each year.

As shared automated networks expand, brands relying on manual warehouses will carry higher fulfillment costs per item. This dynamic will force executive teams to rethink whether operating real estate is truly their core competency.

Three Rules for Winning with Shared Multi-Tenant Logistics

For retail executives, supply chain planners, and operations directors looking at the expansion of multi-tenant networks, navigating this transition requires following three practical rules:

  • Standardize Product Packaging Early: Multi-client robotic grids like AutoStore run on precise physical tolerances. Products must fit neatly inside standardized plastic bins. Shippers with irregular, bulky, or non-standard packaging must either redesign their packaging dimensions or pay extra processing fees to have items repacked before entering the robotic grid.
  • Demand Granular, Real-Time Data Interfaces: When sharing warehouse infrastructure with other retail shippers, you cannot rely on slow, end-of-day spreadsheet updates. Shippers must ensure their Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems connect cleanly to the carrier’s warehouse management system via fast Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). You must be able to track your inventory bins, outbound order statuses, and picking throughput in real time.
  • Balance Carrier Integration with Financial Safeguards: Consolidating ocean transport, inland trucking, and warehouse distribution under a single partner like Maersk generates substantial operating efficiencies. However, it also concentrates counterparty risk. Shippers should negotiate performance-level guarantees with clear baseline service agreements, ensuring that their orders maintain picking priority even when another co-tenant on the shared grid experiences an unexpected surge in demand.

Puma’s partnership with Maersk proves that the warehouse of the future is not a private, single-tenant fortress. It is a shared, automated, and highly responsive utility. Companies that recognize this shift can convert rigid real estate overhead into an agile competitive advantage.

* We may earn an affiliate commission from links in this report, at no extra cost to you and with zero impact on our benchmark data.